Re: Just one verify missing..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:37:24AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> #152763 qt rhl73 (rhl9 OK)
> #152768 ruby fc1 (rhl73, rhl9 OK)
> #152804 openmotif fc1 (rhl73, rhl9 OK)
> #152835 dhcp rhl73
> #152856 sudo fc1 (rhl73, rhl9 OK)
> #152871 nfs-utils fc1 (rhl73, rhl9 OK)
> #152895 mailman rhl73 (rhl9, fc1 OK)
> #152912 imap fc1 (rhl73, rhl9 OK)
> #155508 cvs fc2 (rhl73, rhl9, fc1 OK)
> 
> I think it's pretty important to get these moving.  Maybe packages 
> need to move automatically from updates-testing to updates if there's 
> at least one verify vote (for any arch) and there has been no activity 
> in some time (e.g., 1 or 2 weeks).

And/or do the per-release split thing. (But I think yours is a good idea
when the patches are identical.)


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit.

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux