On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:16:02PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > >Nice. It'd probably be good to add the "component" column to the chart, > >too. > If you can find a way for Red Hat's bugzilla to print that out (i.e., > a bugzilla search URL), why not. I haven't looked at it but I fear > it may be impossible. You can add something like "&columnlist=status,resolution,component,qa_contact" and it will work. (Although probably not that list -- I just copied that out of one of my own scripts.) > I'd certainly be very interested if the summary page was able to > clearly show which release (rhl73,rhl9,fc1,fc2,...) requires more > work, so those who are able/interested in working on just that release > can quickly pick their own. Hopefully we can make that work better in bugzilla itself. But if not, a wrapper layer like this can definitely help. > >I'll take a look at doing that next week if no one else speaks up. > I don't care much -- just that it finds a good home. I'm hoping it > would be done at fedoralegacy.org or at least visible linked from > there, so that folks who'd want to contribute would find it easily. Definitely. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 76 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
