> We will NOT make it the practice and gear our services toward it. Relax. I didn't tell you to make it your practice. I said to *document* the practice prominently, and let people decide for themselves, which I think is what you also want. However, for anyone to be able to use it, you have to gear your services to it, by which I mean you have to avoid doing anything that would harm someone taking all your updates as they come out. As I said, I don't think you need to change how you handle the updates themselves. I'm talking about web site content, mainly, and also a level of awareness for any future situations that may come up. > I will not accept risks FOR a user, > that is up to the user to decide. Don't worry, as an unpaid, volunteer service, nobody has or can ask you to accept a risk for a user. That's also true of FP. Everyone in the Fedora world knows that the buck stops with them. > Opt-in rather than opt-out. Yes. That decision is made by FP when they choose the /etc/rc.d configuration to ship. --jh-- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
