Re: Mirroring: Bad datestamps prevent hardlinking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:04:40AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Note these are superseeded by RH, not FL, e.g. noone wants to remove
> the last vendor provided package, only the ones that the vendor
> himself doomed to /dev/null.

I was talking about _all_ superseeded updates. There is no sense to
mirror deprecated updates around the world.

> Developers may be interested to be able to track a package back, but
> IMHO we don't need that structure replicated over all mirrors raising
> each distros space by a factor of 50%. Just look at the plethora of
> obsoleted kernel packages, e.g. (i686/up only)

Exactly my point. They should be archived, but not replicated
everywhere. Total waste of resources.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@xxxxxxxxxx -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux