On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:34:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:14:01PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:08:30PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Hmmm. No 'fc2' version in the Fedora Legacy product. > > > > (It would be really good if when this is created, it'd be "fc2" rather than > > > > "core2", so that bugs can be easily transferred.) > > > Added. > > That was quick -- thanks! > > Hmm. For some reason, it didn't magically work though, and the version > number had to be reassigned when moving across products. I thought that > worked with my bugzilla. And all of the components got reset to 4Suite. Ah > well -- I cleaned up the mess. :) btw, there's ~600 kernel bugs assigned to FC2 right now. I've sent mail to dkl to ask him to perform some sql magic on the database to make some changes en masse. - A lot of them are very old, and a lot of them have been in NEEDINFO for _months_. These are probably never going to see any responses again. - Recently the FC2/FC3 kernels were very similar, so some bugs may still apply to FC3. For all those still open, I've asked they be transitioned to legacy bugs, with a comment added along the lines of "if this is still present in FC3, please clone this bug and adjust accordingly" Right now FC3 is on 2.6.11, and FC2 is on 2.6.10. I'm guessing you won't want to play the rebase-to-upstream game with -legacy, so you'll be in for some backporting ahead. The good news is the recent FC2 update I did fixes up all the currently known security issues so you should be safe for a while. When it comes to picking up your first bits for a kernel errata feel free to ping me and if I'm not too busy (ha!) I'll try to lend a hand / answer questions etc. (At least whilst 2.6.10 is fresh in my head :) Dave -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
