In the Fedora Legacy docs, we use the terms "Consensus" and "Veto" which maybe are not the best way to do things. Consensus seeks that all or the vast majority of the participants be "for" a position. Veto means that something can be rejected without cause or reason. Instead, it might be suggested we switch to a system of "Consent" in which we don't need everyone to agree on something, but rather just that no one is against it. In order for it not to pass, anyone who is against it must be supported by a valid argument for their position. In other words, instead of requiring mass support, we just need to lack of opposition. And in order to oppose it, the opposition must provide a valid argument against it. Thoughts? -- Eric Rostetter -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
