I'd recommend upgrading to FC3 rather than just upgrading the kernel. Do you have a reason to stay with RH9? Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (610)796-5838 >>> kwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 03/23/05 11:31AM >>> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:12:47 -0300 in > 001601c52fc3$27c865a0$5a4e84c8@anp4 "Eduardo Albergone" > <eduardo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> i need a kertnel 2.6.xx for rh9 where I can find > > Build it yourself? > > You will need to update a considerable number of other things to use 2.6 > kernels with RH9, suggest you read the documentation to find out what. > It's doable and there is a noticeable change in how the system feels, but you're right in that there are a considerable number of (little) things. E.g., modification of some rc scripts, newer modutils, misc other changes. -- * The Digital Hermit http://www.digitalhermit.com * Unix and Linux Solutions kwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
