Re: Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: spamassassin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
I understand very well reasons for "only fixes" policy but there are
situations where this becomes too rigid or unsustainable.  OTOH
"holding a dam" has clear merits but it also may cause a waste of
scarce resources.  No, I do not have clearcut answers which would
be applicable on every occasion.

spamassassin 2.64 is better than no spamassassin.

update from 2.64 to 3.02 is non-trivial (requires user reconfiguration, depending on the settings used) and we shouldn't do that, IMHO.

(FWIW, I have no problem in general with bumping up the versions, but I don't think we can do that when we know it's going to break the configs of our users..)

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux