Re: FC1 legacy for x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 07:57 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> As long as nobody needs to QA x86_64 packages, that's OK (i.e., they 
> don't require +VERIFY or +PUBLISH votes).  It takes way too long to 
> get those for i386 versions as it is..

I'm not really comfortable pushing updates w/out QA.  I suppose this is
where the community can chime in.  How many are on x86_64 that need
updates and are willing to QA?  How do you feel about QA on i386 being
enough to push the update on x86_64?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux