> i've never tried verifying the attached signatures, but that's because i > use pinepg, which (afaict) doesn't deal with detached sigs - only inlined > ones. if anyone can recommend a tool that allows pine to work with > detached signatures, i'd be happy to try it out. For the record: I'm having problems with mutt and the sigs, not much pai...pine here :) Anyone with mutt and GnuPG 1.4 there without any trouble with Marc's announcements? That would give me reason to look for problems here. Mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
