On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 14:08, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Rob Myers wrote: > > what is the larger picture? i advocate the convergence of the > > fedora-legacy releases with the FC-1 cvs tree. > > First, I'm not 100% sure what you're suggesting: let me try and restate what i'm thinking. redhat has an FC-1 tree that is different from the fedora legacy FC-1 tree. i think it would be advantageous to merge these trees. this would alleviate any confusion as to which FC-1 tree is the "correct" FC-1 tree. furthermore, tree convergence would set a clear path for future fedora legacy maintenance. > This implies that the FL FC1 releases will have more than just > minimal security fixes. i think fedora legacy should stick to minimal security fixes, as much as possible. does tree convergence imply that the FC-1 tree would have more than just minimal security fixes? that is not clear to me. could the redhat folks live with a "merged" FC-1 tree with only minimal updates? how does redhat use their FC-1 tree? > The biggest issue here is probably how much effort we'd be willing to > put doing QA and handling the breakage that this approach would imply. again, it is not clear to me that a "merged" FC-1 tree implies more than minimal updates. it would be helpful to hear someone from redhat describe how they currently use their FC-1 tree, and how they plan on using the EOL'd trees in the future. rob. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
