Re: Separating the roles of the QA process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 08:43 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Fine by me.  IMHO, however, it is very useful to run 
> rpm-build-compare.sh on the _binary_ RPMS, to see if there have been 
> any changes (e.g., some library or file went missing by accident, 
> etc.).  These kind of changes are impossible to test on your own.
> 

We had a lot of build problems in mach with missing BuildRequires in Red
Hat's packages so we have to use rpm-build-compare.sh on the resulting
binary packages that are produced in order to find out if anything is
missing. This gets done before packages are put in updates-testing to
make sure mach didn't break anything.

Marc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux