On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:40:04PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > I may get shit for this, but I like mantis far better than bugzilla. And > > i've used both extensively (along with others). > > http://www.mantisbt.org/ > Hmmm. I looked at it a bit, and it doesn't seem to really have the > flexibility and power that bugzilla does. (No fulltext searching, support > for multiple projects (say, for example, more than one src.rpm!) is > immature, etc.) Say what? It most certainly _does_ do fulltext searching, and support for multiple projects is quite mature. There is also a quite nice bug interdependency system which is very easy to use and quite flexible. Don't know what power you think is missing. I use both extensively and I havent found anything bugzilla can do that mantis can't. > Perhaps most importantly, the main Fedora project is based around bugzilla, > and I think it makes sense to keep Legacy the same. However, it would be > cool if the FL bugzilla were as nicely configured as the RH one (especially > their new beta layout -- <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/index.cgi>). That's a pity, because bugzilla is so cumbersome and obtuse. -Dan -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
