On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:11 -0500, Rob Myers wrote: > > Usually we only release security updates, but we can discuss making an > > exception for OOo. > > my thoughts are that if 1) it comes from an upstream maintainer, 2) it > passes QA, and 3) it fixes an existing package without changing it "too > much" it should be published. In fact, for (1) you can drop the "upstream" bit, and make sure that (2) and (3) happen, and a package should still be pushed All this assuming the maintainer in (1) is willing to continue maintaining the package, and let bugs get assigned to her/him -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
