Re: FC1 OpenOffice.org builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:11 -0500, Rob Myers wrote:
 
> > Usually we only release security updates, but we can discuss making an
> > exception for OOo.
> 
> my thoughts are that if 1) it comes from an upstream maintainer, 2) it
> passes QA, and 3) it fixes an existing package without changing it "too
> much" it should be published.

In fact, for (1) you can drop the "upstream" bit, and make sure that (2)
and (3) happen, and a package should still be pushed

All this assuming the maintainer in (1) is willing to continue
maintaining the package, and let bugs get assigned to her/him
-- 
Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux