> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:06:18PM -0500, David Anthrope wrote: > > I see the notices about RH7-8 gone, > > Really? How about this one? > > Advisory ID: FLSA:2089 > Issue date: 2004-10-27 My bad - I misread the notice. > It very much depends on you. As long as there is enough of > people willing to maintain the given code then in could/would > be maintained. Nobody can order you to stop. If you are > asking for how long _others_ will be doing that - well, who knows? I was just asking for opinions/guesses. Yes I read the FAQ so I know the official stance, I was only curious how long people thought it might last. > Not enough of "bodies" were interested in RH8 to keep it. In > any case it is not that different from RH9, which is in many > aspects better done than RH8, so updating is here a rather > simple solution. Thank You -- David Anthrope mailto://David@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.DAnthrope.com -- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
