On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:37:50PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > > > Needs VERIFY [rh9,fc1] > > > > I am using it on FC1. No problems noted. > > > > > cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2072 > > > Needs VERIFY for fc1 > > > > Ditto here. No problems noted, and I use it heavily on my machine. > > Hi, > > Thanks for that report. If you can, could you put PGP-signed bugzilla > comments in with the sha1sums of the files you have tested? Well, I don't know how to. I guess I need to clarify test. I did a yum update on those packages, and then made sure they worked by going to various "difficult" web sites that are either very code intensive or are deemed "Internet Explorer" favored sites; and then with cups, I print jobs through cron as well as on-demand through scripts, and more. What's a shalsum? ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** Work phone: 815-753-5492 * ******************************************************************************* -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
