Hi all, We are making good progress in getting rid of the huge backlog that had built up, and no doubt a raising a few eyebrows with ours advisories of month-old issues ;) However, we still have a little way to go, so if people could look at, for example, verifying the packages listed as to verify below (ignoring the ones marked as superceded) that would be great. Of course, if you have a little more time, addressing the issues in the section entitled "Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED" would be excellent. Cheers, List follows. $Id: issues.txt,v 1.84 2004/10/06 00:25:23 dom Exp $ See bottom for changes This list is also available at http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~dom/legacy/issues.txt Packages that have been verified and should be fully released ------------------------------------------------------------- cvs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1735 Packages waiting to be built for updates-testing ------------------------------------------------ gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 (rh73,superceded) abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906 glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947 (fixed builds) mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2089 Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need active work. ------------------------------------------------------------------ gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237 Needs 2 VERIFY before release. netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257 Needs 2 VERIFY XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 Needs VERIFY before release (superceded). mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269 There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This needs more QA before release. kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484 Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put work into later kernel ticket mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532 Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547 Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719 Needs 2 VERIFY squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732 Needs 1 VERIFY before release (but about to be superceded?) mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737 Needs 1 VERIFY kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804 Needs 2 VERIFY XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 Needs VERIFY for rh9 (superceded) lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833 Needs 1 VERIFY especially for rh9 php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868 Needs 2 VERIFY mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888 Needs 1 VERIFY apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2068 Needs 2 VERIFY cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2072 Needs 2 VERIFY Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED: -------------------------------------------------------- * readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX? kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded) yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Needs 2 PUBLISH krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726 Obsoleted libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add RESOLVED flag. mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548 Need 1 PUBLISH (but superceded?) libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550 Superceded libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 Need 1 PUBLISH for rh9 apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805 Superceded. mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832 Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded? mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 Needs PUBLISH especially for rh73 and FC1, but superceded. samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945 Needs possible renaming of rh7.3 package qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002 Needs 2 PUBLISH gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005 Needs 2 PUBLISH mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 Needs 2 PUBLISH ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007 needs work kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008 Needs 2 PUBLISH mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009 Needs 2 PUBLISH pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010 Needs PUBLISH and full auditing? krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040 Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9 / investigate possible bug introduced imlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2051 Needs PUBLISH [rh73,rh9] ImageMagick - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2052 Needs 2 PUBLISH squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2053 Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9, packages for fc1 samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2057 Need maybe another PUBLISH for 7.3 otherwise building (superceded) cdrecord - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2058 Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 gtk2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2073 Needs 2 PUBLISH openoffice - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2074 Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 and fc1 libxpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075 Needs PUBLISH for rh73,rh9 cupsomatic - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2076 Needs 1 PUBLISH redhat-config-nfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2086 Need 1 or 2 PUBLISH samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2102 Needs PUBLISH for rh73 rp-pppoe - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2116 Needs packages cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2127 Needs QA [rh9,fc1] General (non-package bugs) -------------------------- website docs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2111 FC1 docs missing Notes ----- Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need to be QAd at the source level. Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way ASAP. * means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions. Changes ------- $Log: issues.txt,v $ Revision 1.84 2004/10/06 00:25:23 dom update mozilla Revision 1.83 2004/10/05 22:55:17 dom more updates Revision 1.82 2004/10/05 22:53:17 dom update lots of stuff Revision 1.81 2004/10/03 23:35:51 dom add doc bug Revision 1.80 2004/10/03 23:33:53 dom update httpd, cups, netpbm Revision 1.79 2004/10/03 13:03:33 dom update mod_python, apache, sysstat, mod_ssl, sysstat Revision 1.78 2004/10/02 23:29:39 dom misc Revision 1.77 2004/10/02 23:21:52 dom update XFree86 Revision 1.76 2004/10/02 23:16:07 dom update XFree86 Revision 1.75 2004/10/02 23:14:04 dom update apache, libxpm Revision 1.74 2004/10/02 16:33:14 dom update php Revision 1.73 2004/10/02 14:51:51 dom update cups, squirrelmail .# Revision 1.72 2004/10/02 01:36:06 dom update glibc, mod_python, cvs, fc1 stuff Revision 1.71 2004/10/02 00:14:25 dom updates glibc, mozilla, xfree86 Revision 1.70 2004/09/30 23:39:43 dom remove built packages Revision 1.69 2004/09/30 21:52:07 dom many updates Revision 1.68 2004/09/30 12:39:17 dom delete flim, xchat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
