Dominic, In reviewing this list, I believe the following should also be added to your round-up list: cvs - http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1735 It is currently listed as RESOLVED but seems to be in limbo under updates-testing. On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 20:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > $Id: issues.txt,v 1.47 2004/09/20 00:01:49 dom Exp $ > > See bottom for changes > > This list is also available at > http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~dom/legacy/issues.txt > > Packages that have been verified and should be fully released > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > tcpdump - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468 > cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552 > flim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1581 > rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569 (but superceded) > xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549 > squirrelmail - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1733 > > Packages waiting to be built for updates-testing > ------------------------------------------------ > > gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237 > lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833 > ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1840 > XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 > mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737 > rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2003 > mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888 > XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 > gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 (rh73,superceded) > glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947 > kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804 > abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906 > > Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need > active work. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269 > There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This > needs more QA before release. > > mod_python - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1325 > Needs 1 VERIFY before release. > > ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1419 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. - but dup with 1840? > > kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484 > Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put > work into later kernel ticket > > mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532 > Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded > > lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547 > Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded > > squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732 > Needs 1 VERIFY before release (but about to be superceded?) > > Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED: > -------------------------------------------------------- > > * readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 > Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX? > > netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 > > kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 > Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded) > > yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1708 > Needs PUBLISH for rh9 (but superceded) > > krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726 > Obsoleted > > libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 > Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add > RESOLVED flag. > > sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372 > Need 2 PUBLISH - 7.3 only I think > > mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548 > Need 1 PUBLISH (but superceded?) > > libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550 > Superceded > > libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 > Need 1 PUBLISH for rh9 > > tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719 > Resolve problems with how to version and build fix > > apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805 > Is this redundant? > > mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832 > Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded? > > mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 > Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9 + rebuilt galeon SRPM with fixed build-deps > > php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh7.3 > > samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 > > gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945 > Needs PUBLISH for rh9 and possible renaming of rh7.3 package > > qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007 > needs work > > kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009 > Needs work > > pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010 > Needs PUBLISH and full auditing? > > krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040 > Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9 > > imlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2051 > Needs more work for further bugs > > ImageMagick - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2052 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2053 > Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 > > samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2057 > Need maybe another PUBLISH for each release otherwise building > > cdrecord - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2058 > Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 > > apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2068 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2072 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > gtk2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2073 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > openoffice - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2074 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > libxpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075 > Needs packages/confirmation > > General (non-package bugs) > -------------------------- > > Notes > ----- > > Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need > to be QAd at the source level. > > Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need > testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way > ASAP. > > * means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug > system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions. > > Changes > ------- > > $Log: issues.txt,v $ > Revision 1.47 2004/09/20 00:01:49 dom > update gtk > > Revision 1.46 2004/09/19 18:16:32 dom > update squirrelmail > > Revision 1.45 2004/09/19 17:53:23 dom > move xchat to fully-release pile > > Revision 1.44 2004/09/19 17:24:04 dom > update abiword > > Revision 1.43 2004/09/19 16:54:24 dom > remove more old bugs > > Revision 1.42 2004/09/19 16:53:19 dom > remove more old bugs > > Revision 1.41 2004/09/19 11:35:49 dom > update gdk-pixbuf, openoffice > remove dead kernel bug > > Revision 1.40 2004/09/18 00:31:26 dom > update kernel > > Revision 1.39 2004/09/17 23:47:10 dom > update gdk-pixbuf, cups, remove cupsomatic > > Revision 1.38 2004/09/17 01:17:47 dom > update httpd > > [...] > > > !DSPAM:414e1fed162251483713606! > > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list > > !DSPAM:414e1fed162251483713606!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
