Re: Round-up, 2004-09-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Eric Rostetter wrote:

Hopefully we won't have broken packages, so we won't have to fix them.

As far as I see it there would be only two sources of concern to me, two situations I would not be able to deal with:


1. A broken rpm package. As long as rpm works everything is fine and dandy with me. I am too much of a linux newbie to have a clue of how to deal with a broken rpm

2. I currently have a RedHat 7.2 development server. The new iptables package was incompatible with the old kernel so I had to upgrade the kernel instead of installing a new one. A broken kernel that requires update instead of install would also stress my abilitiess.

I personally can live with a couple of days of downtime due to broken packages.

I have spent five years reading bugtraq. I have seen terminator 3 (which coincidentaly was released at about the same time as blaster).

It gives me a false sense of security (which I appreciate) to see a lot of activity in my yum logs.

Andres


-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux