Re: Round-up, 2004-09-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, so I've started looking at some of these packages, what is the
procedure to close them?  For instance, the rsync package (bug 1569)
looks to be resolved and confirmed.  I see that it has made it's way to
updates-testing... how does it get from there to updates?

-Jim P.

On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 21:17, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> (Posting this again to let people know of the URL - I'll try and post
> regularly, but not this regularly, hereafter)
> 
> $Id: issues.txt,v 1.8 2004/09/08 23:38:03 dom Exp $
> 
> See bottom for changes
> 
> This list is also available at
> http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~dom/legacy/issues.txt
> 
> Packages that have been verified and should be fully released
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> tcpdump - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
> 
> 
> Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need
> active work.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269
> There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This
> needs more QA before release.
> 
> mod_python - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1325
> Needs 2 VERIFY before release.
> 
> ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1419
> Needs 2 VERIFY before release. - but dup with 1840?
> 
> kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484
> Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put
> work into later kernel ticket
> 
> mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
> Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
> 
> lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547
> Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
> 
> cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
> Needs 1 VERIFY before release.
> 
> rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569
> Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded.
> 
> flim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1581
> Needs 1 VERIFY before release.
> 
> squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732
> Needs 1 VERIFY before release (but about to be superceded?)
> 
> squirrelmail - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1733
> Needs 2 VERIFY before release (also double check no new issues have
> cropped up)
> 
> xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549
> Needs 2 VERIFY before release.
> 
> Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1583
> IMO this shouldn't be in the Package Request component
> close WONTFIX re rh8?
> 
> vsftp - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1778
> Resolution of whether we are vulnerable needed.
> 
> * kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1797
> VM (non-security) bug in rh9 that was never fixed before EOL. Looks to
> me like this should be closed WONTFIX.
> 
> * rpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1864
> No rationale given for bug request - the rh bug it refers to dates from
> before rh7.3 EOL. WONTFIX?
> 
> * readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
> Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX?
> 
> XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
> This has had 2 PUBLISHes for 7.3 and the only problem holding it back
> was likely a gdk-pixbuf red herring. Packages should be built for this
> and pushed to updates-testing I think.
> 
> gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded?)
> 
> * cal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
> Should be closed WONTFIX IMO
> 
> yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1708
> Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 - superceded?
> 
> mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888
> Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh7.3 - superceded?
> 
> krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726
> Obsoleted
> 
> mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737
> Has 2 PUBLISH, build packages for updates-testing or fix further
> minor non-security issues
> 
> libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
> Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add
> RESOLVED flag.
> 
> gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
> Packages built for updates-testing and/or a couple of formal PUBLISH
> needed.
> 
> sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
> Need 2 PUBLISH - 7.3 only I think
> 
> mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548
> Need 2 PUBLISH (but superceded?)
> 
> libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
> Superceded
> 
> libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943
> Need 2 PUBLISH
> 
> tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719
> Resolve problems with how to version and build fix
> 
> kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804
> Need 2 PUBLISH
> 
> apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
> Is this redundant?
> 
> XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831
> Check how this stands with the other open XFree86 bug
> 
> mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832
> Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded?
> 
> lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1840
> Needs PUBLISH for rh9
> 
> php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh7.3
> 
> abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
> 
> subversion - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1907
> Analysis and build fixed packages
> 
> samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
> 
> gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945
> Needs PUBLISH - rh9 status?
> 
> glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947
> Needs PUBLISH
> 
> qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002
> RPM needs work
> 
> rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2003
> Needs PUBLISH
> 
> gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005
> Analyse and see whether relevant
> 
> mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
> needs work
> 
> ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
> needs work
> 
> kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008
> Needs analysis
> 
> mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009
> Needs work
> 
> pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010
> Needs PUBLISH
> 
> krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040
> Fix broken 7.3 packages, then QA
> 
> mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2041
> Needs work
> 
> zlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
> Needs work
> 
> * kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1614
> close WONTFIX? Reporter gone AWOL.
> 
> imlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
> Prepare packages.
> 
> ImageMagick - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2052
> Prepare packages.
> 
> squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2053
> Prepare packages.
> 
> General (non-package bugs)
> --------------------------
> 
> * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1599
> applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX?
> 
> * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1437
> applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX?
> 
> * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1586
> applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX?
> 
> https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1963
> Website needs fixing
> 
> https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1652
> Website fix?
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need
> to be QAd at the source level.
> 
> Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need
> testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way
> ASAP.
> 
> * means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug
> system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions.
> 
> Changes
> -------
> 
> $Log: issues.txt,v $
> Revision 1.8  2004/09/08 23:38:03  dom
> move tcpdump to release pile
> update cadaver, flim, squid
> add imlib, imagemagick, squid
> 
> Revision 1.7  2004/09/08 22:58:17  dom
> new lha packages
> 
> Revision 1.6  2004/09/08 16:46:13  dom
> gaim -> need publish, fix broken ethereal URL
> 
> Revision 1.5  2004/09/08 12:42:32  dom
> tcpdump needs rh9 verify
> 
> Revision 1.4  2004/09/08 11:50:55  dom
> no changes
> 
> Revision 1.2  2004/09/08 01:23:41  dom
> add tags
> 
> 
> --
> 
> fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux