On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:07 pm, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:05:07PM -0500, Simon Weller wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 September 2004 11:58 am, David Botsch wrote: > > > I think we may need a different status for something in update-testing, > > > then. If a bug is marked resolved, it doesn't normally show up when on > > > searches for LEGACY bugs (by say, clicking the link on the main FL > > > page). > > > > > > To me, resolved says, everything is done. > > > > I agree, it would make life a lot easier. > > Hi, > > RESOLVED PENDING means precisely that. It's not obvious but once you > know it perfectly satisfactory. I don't see the benefit of introducing > another status. > > Cheers, > > Dominic. > well now we know ;-) - Sk > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list -- Simon Weller LPIC-2, BCIP Systems Engineer NZServers LTD http://www.nzservers.com/ U.S. Branch <- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. - Scott Granneman, Security Focus -> -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
