Re: Let's get moving

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think we may need a different status for something in update-testing, then.
If a bug is marked resolved, it doesn't normally show up when on searches for
LEGACY bugs (by say, clicking the link on the main FL page).

To me, resolved says, everything is done.

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:58:36AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:06:26PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > Yes, they should be directed to this list, and the bugzilla entry is likely
> > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
> > Ah, I guess I didn't expect a bug for a package in QA to be in status
> > RESOLVED. 
> 
> Sure -- issue itself has been resolved, but that resolution needs testing.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> 
> 
> --
> 
> fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-- 
********************************
David William Botsch
Consultant/Advisor II
CCMR Computing Facility
dwb7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
********************************


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux