Thanks for this list Dominic, it makes it easier seeing what still needs to be done. I've posted a verify for tcpdump. - Si On Tuesday 07 September 2004 07:34 pm, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Recent discussion has thrown up some confusion on the state of the > package release system (including on my part :), so here is a reminder > of what needs to be done on currently pending packages. > > See bottom for some notes on these lists. > > Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need > active work. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269 > There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This > needs more QA before release. > > mod_python - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1325 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. > > ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1419 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. - but dup with 1840? > > tcpdump - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468 > Needs 1 VERIFY before release. > > kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484 > Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put > work into later kernel ticket > > mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532 > Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded > > lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547 > Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded > > cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. > > rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569 > Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded. > > flim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1581 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. > > squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. > > squirrelmail - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1733 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release (also double check no new issues have > cropped up) > > xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549 > Needs 2 VERIFY before release. > > Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED: > -------------------------------------------------------- > > * yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1583 > IMO this shouldn't be in the Package Request component > close WONTFIX re rh8? > > vsftp - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1778 > Resolution of whether we are vulnerable needed. > > * kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1797 > VM (non-security) bug in rh9 that was never fixed before EOL. Looks to > me like this should be closed WONTFIX. > > * rpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1864 > No rationale given for bug request - the rh bug it refers to dates from > before rh7.3 EOL. WONTFIX? > > * readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 > Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX? > > XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 > This has had 2 PUBLISHes for 7.3 and the only problem holding it back > was likely a gdk-pixbuf red herring. Packages should be built for this > and pushed to updates-testing I think. > > gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237 > Needs new vulnerability to be investigated and fixes built. > > netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 > Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded?) > > * cal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1439 > Should be closed WONTFIX IMO > > yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1708 > Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 - superceded? > > mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888 > Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh7.3 - superceded? > > krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726 > Obsoleted > > mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737 > Has 2 PUBLISH, build packages for updates-testing or fix further > minor non-security issues > > libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 > Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add > RESOLVED flag. > > gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 > Packages built for updates-testing and/or a couple of formal PUBLISH > needed. > > sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372 > Need 2 PUBLISH - 7.3 only I think > > mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548 > Need 2 PUBLISH (but superceded?) > > libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550 > Superceded > > libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 > Need 2 PUBLISH > > tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719 > Resolve problems with how to version and build fix > > kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804 > Need 2 PUBLISH > > apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805 > Is this redundant? > > XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 > Check how this stands with the other open XFree86 bug > > mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832 > Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded? > > lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833 > Verify all patches are there, and make updated SRPMs available. > > mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 > Needs PUBLISH for rh9 > > php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh7.3 > > abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 > > subversion - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1907 > Analysis and build fixed packages > > samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 > Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9 > > gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 > Needs 2 PUBLISH > > sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945 > Needs PUBLISH - rh9 status? > > glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947 > Needs PUBLISH > > qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002 > RPM needs work > > rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2003 > Needs PUBLISH > > gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005 > Analyse and see whether relevant > > mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 > needs work > > ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007 > needs work > > kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008 > Needs analysis > > mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009 > Needs work > > pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010 > Needs PUBLISH > > krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040 > Fix broken 7.3 packages, then QA > > mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2041 > Needs work > > zlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2043 > Needs work > > * kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1614 > close WONTFIX? Reporter gone AWOL. > > General (non-package bugs) > -------------------------- > > * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1599 > applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX? > > * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1437 > applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX? > > * https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1586 > applies to rh8 only - WONTFIX? > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1963 > Website needs fixing > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1652 > Website fix? > > > Notes > ----- > > I marked a few duplicate bugs as CLOSED to make the RESOLVED > query more useful (and less overwhelming!) but then stopped as I > realised this may be not what people expect. Any opinions on this? I > don't particularly see any reason to keep dups in any other state, as > they by definition to not describe anything that isn't recorded > elsewhere. > > Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need > to be QAd at the source level. > > Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need > testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way > ASAP. > > I'll endeavour to do this more often... Hopefully we can get lots of things > ready for the new build server to crunch on :) > > * means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug > system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions. > > Cheers, > > Dominic. -- Simon Weller LPIC-2, BCIP Systems Engineer NZServers LTD http://www.nzservers.com/ U.S. Branch <- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. - Scott Granneman, Security Focus -> -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
