Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Especially if and when "Legacy" decides to stop supporting CL3.1 in > favor of only CL3.2 in the CL3/EL3 series. In fact, the whole > designation is a "good guide" on how to CL/EL will be supported (which > I'm detailing now in another section). > ... > If it helps Red Hat and the Fedora team explain why Legacy is still > releasing updates for Fedore Core 4 (CL4.2) and Fedora Core 1 (CL3.2), > but not Fedora Core 2 (CL4.1) or Fedora Core 3 (CL4.0), the "technical > designation" might be adopted. But that's just being hopeful. Okay, I've now renamed Section 4 "Distribution Updates," and inserted the following Subsections ... Section 4.1, "The Old Update Model": http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-4.html#ss4.1 Section 4.2, "The New Update Model": http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-4.html#ss4.2 The previous Section 4 layout on "The Technopolitical History" has now been pushed back as Subsection 4.3 for "further discussion": http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-4.html#ss4.3 Please, comments, corrections, etc... _always_ welcome! I also want to make sure I'm not "crossing the line" where Red Hat takes some legal issues with it. It's really for their own benefit (I'm a big believer in the split Fedora - Red Hat Enterprise Linux model). -- Compatibility matrix of Red Hat(R) distributions of Linux(R): http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
