On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 13:16, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > B. A listing of inter-release "binary" compatibility > http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html > Just some things I'm trying to document that I can point to in order to > "reduce the confusion" -- especially for people who trusted the "old Red > Hat Linux" model. Okay, with a few suggestions, I've changed the table layout in Section 3: http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html#ss3.1 http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html#ss3.2 I've also filled a _lot_ on the release-by-release specifics of LibC/GLibC, GCC and the Linux kernel (3.3). I would really like someone to check my technical accuracy on this information: http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html#ss3.3 There is also a section (3.4) on UNIX, C, etc... to explain C libraries, etc... to semi-technical people that may not be familar. Help in making that more "layman" is _always_ appreciated. I tried to do it in 6 paragraphs (and deleted/rewrote a _lot_): http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html#ss3.4 -- Compatibility matrix of Red Hat(R) distributions of Linux(R): http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
