> That's interesting how you say that, you don't have a RH8 system and you're > making a recommendation based on that. Before FL dropped RH8 support, I ran 5 > large RH8 production servers, never had a problem with any of them and really > never needed to upgrade, they were humming along just fine. I said I didn't have a RH8 system, not that I had never had one. RH8 has major problems with the RPM database system with RPM transactions benchmarked to take over 4 times longer than RH7.3. Sure.. they'll be just fine if you leave them alone but then so would a Slackware 2.0 machine. :) However, as soon as one attempts to do any sort of RPM development or even update RPMs on a regular basis (I'm in the webhosting arena and PHP, Apache and Control panel updates are common) the RPM system goes to hell. *shrugs* You've switched to RH9 now? Ironic. ;) Stuart -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
