Re: Redhat 8 to 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bas Vermeulen wrote:

On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 12:00, Michael Kratz wrote:


I've got a redhat 8 server, and out of interest I configured yum to use the
redhat 9 repositories, then toyed with yum update <insert popular package>
(i.e. apache, sendmail, etc) what is interesting is that with some of these
theres very few dependencies to do the upgrade. (i.e. dependency for
sendmail was tcpwrappers, and thats it)

My question is, is this a bad thing to do, and would it really break
anything by upgrading some things to the Redhat 9 versions?



Personally I've just upgraded my server with apt-get upgrade from RH 8 to RH 9. Works so far, with 0 downtime.

Bas Vermeulen





At the monthly LUG hackfest I was talking to a couple people about upgrading redhat 8 --> rh9
and it was mentioned to boot the rh8 system with the redhat 9 install cd #1 and select upgrade anybody see any pitfalls in this method versus apt-get or yum. I do have physical access to the redhat 8 server.

thx's





--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux