David Botsch wrote: > The only thing to think about with FC1, perhaps, is that it is the last > 2.4 kernel release (unless FC2 offers a substitute 2.4. kernel). For many, > going to the 2.6 kernel at this time is not a viable option. Reasons > include wanting to let it be out there for a while to see what is and is > not broken. > > In our case, we use a filesystem called Openafs. The 2.6 kernel completely > broke openafs. I won't get into the politics of the situation, but if we > were to go to a fedora core relase, it would have to be FC1. FWIW, I believe that you can run a FC1 kernel on FC2, but I have not tried it. I need to however, as one machine I've upgraded to FC2 is showing some strange NFS problems when reading from an IRIX share which aren't present in FC1. -Dave -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
