On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 01:47, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > This still sucks developer time to backport fixes (for things that don't > > really rebuild) and even though it's "unsupported" it's still coming from > > Fedora Legacy and thus expected to be good. > > Wasn't AS 2.1 built off RHL 7.2? So wouldn't the patches be fairly easy > to come by in most cases? I think that was the argument before... Indeed it's based on RHL 7.2 so for most packages supporting 7.2 should be quite easy using AS 2.1 updates. - Panu - -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
