A better way of doing this would be to offer some unofficial advice that people should use 7.3 packages if they want to risk it.
I don't think that is better. And it would have to be advice to rebuild the src rpm packages, not to use the binary rpm packages.
Another option might be to call 7.2 and 8.0 unsupported, continue to support the uploading and QA of packages for those releases, but *not* to delay releases for 7.3 and 9.
I kind of see that as really what the first proposal was about, though it didn't say it exactly/explicitely.
That way the really important stuff can get fixed by those who care, and it doesn't greatly affect the rest of the project (beyond the extra admin work required to rebuild and issue extra advisories)
It's certainly worth discussion.
Dominic.
-- Eric Rostetter
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
