Proposed change for file locations on download server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've been thinking over the way we have files on the server, and I've 
thought of a solution to a problem.

Problem:  legacy-utils provided may not install cleanly to a freshly 
installed legacy OS.  Some packages may have to be updated.

Proposed Solution:  legacy-utils will contain utilities that are built 
against a non-updated OS install (fresh from the CDs).  Updates to these 
utilities will be provided in the updates/ tree for the release.

The only drawback is that non-original packages will be placed into the 
updates/ tree.  After some thought, I'm comfortable with this, as 
individuals that do not have these packages installed will not be effected 
by this.

Are there any objections to transitioning our download server to this 
method?

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAqXK34v2HLvE71NURAt33AKCYnT3/i5x9x0AJ5IKXmy8GbpPfHQCdFG5s
TFzSyMrFgivDxq1FIhjYwoM=
=Yq2f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux