-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 May 2004 06:49, Mike Jones wrote: > Maybe a better solution would be for them to add the legacy updates > to their site. ÂThis would not require users of FC1 to change > anything about how they update. ÂThis would also imply that all the > Fedora mirrors would pick up the updates and lower the load the > legacy servers. > > The only problem with this would be that we would either have to use > the Fedora PGP key or users would have to add our PGP key, but I > think that would be an easier problem to solve. Not going to happen. This gives the idea that the updates came from Red Hat, not from Fedora Legacy. Red Hat wants to make sure there is a clear idea that Fedora Legacy packages are NOT Red Hat packages. Our mirroring system is growing daily and our load isn't that bad on the servers. We need more packagers and QA people than anything. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFApN3L4v2HLvE71NURArgkAKCLyNyDOIyHfeDDS4klTwzQOqhjnwCeN9qq 8uEM+CNFj9IbVuMgWEEAPLU= =xUci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
