On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:49:26PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > In the absence of any further comment I've included the patch from > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/arch/i386/kernel/pci-pc.c@xxxx?nav=index.html|src/|src/arch|src/arch/i386|src/arch/i386/kernel|hist/arch/i386/kernel/pci-pc.c > and am rebuilding the packages for further testing. If anyone thinks > that we definitely shouldn't be putting this fix in please speak now! P.S. Are the version numbers I'm using at the moment suitable? For example, kernel-2.4.20-31.7.legacy.2. It just occured to me that I can't see any other FL updates with that numbering scheme so maybe kernel-2.4.20-31.7.2.legacy would be better? (or since there won't be any further official Red Hat updates, just kernel-2.4.20-32.7.legacy). I know this isn't a clearcut decision but can anyone comments (Jesse?) Cheers, Dominic. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
