> Ouch. That seem like a recipe for disaster. What if RH would, out of the > blue, decide to actually release an official update to something we thought > was completely out of maintenance? Not likely to happen with 7.x, but maybe > one or two RHL9 updates will still trickle out. I think Seth's choice of not > touching the base RH package's version number is a better policy choice -- > largely _because_ there is no upstream constant method. Instead, we should > leave whatever they do alone, and add after that. Red hat knows that fedora legacy exists. If they pull anything like that for a 7.x release then I will feel very very justified in smacking the packager in question. -sv -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
