On Monday 05 April 2004 17:32, Colin Charles wrote: > Would you like to provide a tiny write-up for the Fedora News Updates > next? Maybe you can use it as a focal point for a call for > volunteers? If I had an ounce of free time I might, but things are a bit busy this next week or so. Especially w/ the move of download.fedoralegacy.org. I'd do a Q/A session, or approve a writeup by one of the other community members, but I haven't the capacity right now to do a writeup myself ): > > > Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere > > > > It hasn't exactly been clear. > > Yes, I was under the impression that: While Core 1 is being supported > by RH, the Legacy project keeps 7.x, 8, and 9 in support. When Core 2 > is out, we moved to 8,9,Core 1. Core 3 brings us 9, Core 1, Core 2. > And so on... > > This might need to become clearer (or am I the only one getting such > an impression?) It can be somewhat confusing, Rolling supported releases are in effect for Fedora Core releases, not RHL releases. How would you suggest we word it on our website? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00296.pgp
Description: signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list