Hi John, please subscribe to the mach-devel list as well, so people are kept informed. On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 20:58, John Dalbec wrote: > According to http://www.fedora.us/wiki/HOWTOFindMissingBuildRequires, neither > gcc-c++ nor python should be listed as a BuildRequires:. I know about gcc-c++ being on that page (and I still disagree, but that's personal opinion). I just now noticed that python got added, and don't understand why. I'll ask. > However, the default > mach configuration does not install either package on Red Hat 7.2 unless it is > listed as a BuildRequires:. Yep. I'd prefer to keep gcc-c++ out of there, but it could be added for fedora.us only. > I'm trying to build XFree86. Should I add gcc-c++ > as a BuildRequires or change my /etc/mach/dist file? If you're building it for fedora.us explicitly, I guess you should add it to your /etc/mach/dist. If it were me, I'd be adding it to BuildRequires: though. Thomas Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/ <-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*-> And I'm not the drowning man you think I flail my arms and refuse to sink <-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*-> URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/
