Quoting Warren Togami <warren@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Okay, it seems that everyone is opposed to the removal or crippling of > mpg321. We should go ahead with our first security update announcement. This never happened. I'm reposting this to the list to remind people (raise awareness) that this was never handled... > After we agree upon that template, then the draft for the mpg321 > no-package Legacy security advisory must be written advising users about > the license issue preventing update, and suggestion to remove mpg321. This sounds good to me. Anyone up to the task? -- Eric Rostetter
