On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:38, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Jason Lim <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > If that is the case (that yum 1.x works around whatever bug is in rpm) > > then isn't rolling yum 1.x the logical path, rather than issuing > > non-essential upgrades for rpm? > > Uhm, so forcing them to install *new* software is okay, but forcing them > to install a fix for *broken* software they already have installed isn't? > > Or, forcing them to install and learn yum is okay, but letting them use > the software they already know how to us and already have installed > (apt, rpm, etc) is wrong? Well, some of us have been using yum all along :) -sv
