On Thursday 29 January 2004 08:49, Jason Lim wrote: > If that is the case (that yum 1.x works around whatever bug is in > rpm) then isn't rolling yum 1.x the logical path, rather than issuing > non-essential upgrades for rpm? I suppose some people will want to > upgrade rpm anyway, and they should have the choice, but this choice > should not be mandatory imho. The choice never was going to be mandatory. It was an optional upgrade from the very beginning. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00247.pgp
Description: signature
