Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > This is a real problem, and one I envisioned from the start. When I > started this project, I only wanted to support RHL 7.3 and 9, but due to > community influence, I've included support for 7.2 and 8.0 as well. I'm > going to implement a policy that if a package receives good feedback on > 7.3, and no other feedback with in 3 days, that the entire package group > will be pushed to updates. Does anybody have a problem with this policy? I'd rather say if it receives good feedback on either 7.x version, and good feedback on either of the 8/9 versions, then push them all. The 7.x versions are close enough to justify pushing one based on the other, and the 8/9 versions are somewhat close enough also. But to push 9 based on 7.3 seems a stretch unless the patch was really trivial. Now, that doesn't matter as much until we take over support for 9 anyway. If you are going to push all versions based on feedback of one version, maybe we should at least put a note/disclaimer in the announcement that it was done that way? Having said that, feel free to ignore my opinion if desired ;) I'm not really very attached to it ;) -- Eric Rostetter
