Sucks, but clearly it is a different revision. I think we do this for people who are using this packages bleeding edge and want to be able to upgrade smoothly. The other thing we could do is have a testing.legacy in the tag. Allowing us to do what ever we want until we officially release. I think that is a headache though. Let just bump the rev if we have too. -- Christian Pearce http://www.commnav.com Jesse Keating said: > > A recent problem found in the 8.0 build of tcpdump shows that > autoconf213 is needed to complete the build correctly. Because of > this, we need to modify the current candidate for publish in bugzilla. > Since we will be modifying it, should we bump the build ID up one more > on the package? I think yes, as it shows clearly a newer package > within the ticket. I'm pretty sure that RH goes through a few bumps > internally, as there can be a jump in the number from update to update. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) > Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) > Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) > GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) > > Was I helpful? Let others know: > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
