On Friday 16 January 2004 08:55, Christian Pearce wrote: > I guess it isn't for me. I want to try and clarify. > > In all cases leave epoch alone. > > We use the same spec file but the _revisions_ are different. > > elm: > > dist|orig|legacy > 7.2 elm-2.5.6-1 -> elm-2.5.6.3.legacy > 7.3 elm-2.5.6-2 -> elm-2.5.6.3.legacy > > tcpdump: > 7.2 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.4.legacy > 7.3 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.4.legacy > 8.0 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.4.legacy Not quite. if the package is the same across the 7.x platform, the disttag becomes 7x. But if there is no distag already in the package name, please don't add one. elm: 7.2 elm-2.5.6-1 -> elm-2.5.6-3.legacy 7.3 elm-2.5.6-2 -> elm-2.5.6-4.legacy tcpdump: 7.2 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.4.legacy 7.3 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.4.legacy 8.0 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.4.legacy This seems fine. In the past, RH has bumped the last number up, leaving the "-17.x.x" alone, so we should follow suit on this one. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00182.pgp
Description: signature
