On Jan 14, 2004, Warren Togami wrote: > > I am currently well beyond the burn out point, so you cannot count me to > continue to push Legacy forward. I will only continue mainly in an > advisory position, replicating the build server and signing > infrastructure to Jesse Keatings and PogoLinux sponsored server to be > hosted at QuantumLinux. Other than that, I will try to post mainly > about the large needs of the project and ways in which you can help, > until it is no longer needed. Thanks. > http://www.fedoralegacy.org/ > > Think about what a user seeking help from the EOL disaster would think > when they see the page. For one, the Legacy Launch Plan (draft 2) is > very old by this point. Another thing is the complete lack of mention > of the existing published yum for RH7.x. Overall some parts like the > launch plan need to be rewritten & replaced entirely, perhaps with a > project overview type thing. I think at this point the "Plan" should just become what are policy is. Right? I will take some time today and try to review the site and come up with a laundry list of items. Then work on some of what I can. > The rest of the site needs a lot more explanation about how things work, > and what the user needs to do, but unfortunately that cannot come > without the packages being worked on, QA'ed and published. > > http://www.fedora.us/LEGACY > > Do your best to work within the existing fedora.us policies, and discuss > here about ways to further modify those rules for legacy. I will update > the fedora.us documentation to match the saner ideas in the > discussion. I will help by building whatever is approved, and sometimes > approving packages myself. I personally have the capability to QA and > test packages on RH8 only, but due to limited time I will only do a > select few. (Like CVS is probably the most serious right now.) Thanks for your help. -- Christian Pearce http://www.commnav.com
