Re: Update Announcement Format discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The point would be that if the announcements are all sent (and signed)  
> by one person, or a small group of persons, the ID number could be left
> empty until just a moment before the announcement is sent (and stored).  
> No race condition then, except within the head of the one person (or a
> small group of persons).

But that's the thing I'm getting at. It's incredibly easy to create a web 
form that looks like a fill-in-the-blanks template. Rather than having to 
resort to some hacked XML format (which would never work with humans at 
the helm), a form template would allow us to  1) separate out the data 
segments so they're individually searchable,  2) ensure that everything 
is consistently formatted and  3) Numbering would be immutably accurate.


> But if the assumption is that whoever did the backport would sent the
> announcement him/herself (IMHO, this sounds a bit problematic), this
> would obviously not work..

Right, and I'd say that is a bad assumption for a number of reasons, but I 
think we're in agreement, so I'll say-no-more...

-Chuck



-- 
 http://www.quantumlinux.com 
 Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
 ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology

 "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply 
  social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux