On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:36:27AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > Backporting has been the goal since day 1 for previous RHL releases. > FC releases is still in the air. RH will not focus so much on > backports for FC updates, rather they'll go the route of new > packages. How should Legacy respond to this? A good question. Upstream updating and guaranteeing stable API/ABIs are contraditory. FC1 is not dead yet, so I suggest to address these questions when FC1 is about to EOL. One should examine the then existing interest groups and the given available options. > As for RHL releases, backporting is absolutely the goal. Glad to hear that. -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp00159.pgp
Description: PGP signature
