Re: RH7.x package signing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RH7.x package signing
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 00:30:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <3FF75B19.8090004@togami.com>
References: <3FF75B19.8090004@togami.com>
Reply-to: fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-legacy-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

Warren Togami (warren@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> This is just to clarify, RPM packages for RH7.x must be signed by 
> rpm-4.0.4 right?

No. We've been pushing updates signed with 4.1 or later for quite
a while now.

Bill

References:
- RH7.x package signing
  - From: Warren Togami

Prev by Date: Re: Unneeded assertions (supposed to have been: RPM upgrade discussion)
Next by Date: Re: Unneeded assertions (supposed to have been: RPM upgrade discussion)
Previous by thread: Re: RH7.x package signing
Next by thread: apt preparation for RH7.x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux