Warren Togami said: > Given the complete lack of initiative and direction by anyone else here, > I stepped in and offered a structured and proven solution based upon the > highly successful fedora.us development model. I even proposed this > plan to those who said they wanted to be Legacy leaders during early > December, but I got ZERO replies (other than Michael). > > If the majority here dislikes what I am doing, then say so. Then > subsequently be prepared to step in and keep the ball rolling with your > own solutions. > > Heck, even if you agree with the direction that I am pushing, I > realistically cannot remain pushing initiatives here. My time is very > short after January 5th. > > Unless others show more initatiative this project will die. I > personally do not even USE the distributions that Legacy would support, > but I worked hard on this because I wanted to give the community at > least the chance. > > Given the lack of prior discussion, I wondered if they were even here to > begin with. It is my hope that this proposed framework will at least > give them the chance to make it succeed. > > Please feel free to discuss and improve the proposed framework. > > Warren I am working on it. I appreciate all you have done so far. It seems to be there are very few interested developers so far. So I am going to read up on the Submission proccess. And get more involved. It seems to me at this point we have a pretty good framework of a policy and procedures defined. Not having read the submission process, I recall from memory we have package owners and QA people. What is a method for staying informed of fixes? Ad Hoc? We should also have a specific team of people to vote security fixes in or out. I don't want to see it a mailing list vote of all those involved. Considering this is going to be time crucial. Warren, You mentioned you are at Red Hat 9 and FC1 that you have not interest in RHL 7.x-8.0. Do you intend to use FedoraLegacy for Red Hat 9 and FC1 and FC2 and beyond? If so I would imagine you would take more interest in the future use of this project. Not that you haven't. You have done a lot and we appreciate it. I was just curious. Okay back to reading. -- Christian Pearce http://www.commnav.com
