-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > In a bugzilla entry it was requested that I post the Fedora Legacy > finger print. Here it be. > > pub 1024D/731002FA 2004-01-19 Fedora Legacy > (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) <secnotice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Key fingerprint = D66D 121F 9784 5E7B 2757 8C46 108C 4512 7310 02FA > sub 2048g/D12E351D 2004-01-19 Cool. Thanks Jesse! > The GPG key that is on our website is alone w/out any signatures. > This is what we use to sign packages as there is a bug with RPM when > you use a key that has signatures on it. No shit? I've never run into that one. I sign all the packages I build for my own systems and have never run into this. I'm mostly using 7.3 now, though I've done this on each redhat version since around 6.0. I've got less testing time with 8.0 or 9, but I have built and checked rpm's on both those versions using keys with multiple signatures on them. Anyone have a pointer to where I can learn more about this rpm bug? - -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ====================================================================== The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -- Alexis De Tocqueville. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. iD8DBQFALVbbuv+09NZUB1oRAoLEAJ9jcoX99vJQqtjDJhdO85C8GYEKKwCeNruv 2k5MOyAmktUBnwJnO53No24= =77gH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
