On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:41:31PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Todd <Freedom_Lover@xxxxxxxxx>: > > >For example, say you're going to QA apt (cause everyone wants to), > > I'd love to (now that I have gpg keys and all). sweet. > >you'd find it in bugzilla and look at the entries there. You see that > >in Jason's latest comment there he's linked these two files: > > > > https://mail.codegrinder.com/www/apt4/md5sum.asc > > > >https://mail.codegrinder.com/www/apt4/apt-0.5.15cnc5-0.fdr.7.rh73.legacy.src.rpm > > > >Download them both. Then run rpm --checksig -v (or just -Kv if you're > >lazy like me) on the rpm file. Assuming you already have Jason's key > >(and you probably don't yet, but we'll get to that later), you should > >get output like this: > > Uhm, but that is a rh73 file, no? What if I want to test it on rh72 or > rh8? Is no one working on these? Do I need to create them myself? > I find the thread in bugzilla hard to follow myself... > > I'm not against making apt rh8 rpms, I just not sure if that is what > I should be doing or not, etc. > That src.rpm should build work with rh72,73,80 (and probably 9 whenever we take that over too) Though, if you're building on 8.0, please note what rpm you're building against, since there seems to be some disparity about that lately. I personally support Warren's proposal that if you want to use the legacy tools, you update rpm. -jason
Attachment:
pgp00120.pgp
Description: PGP signature
