> > To facilitate this, I had thought of using a WIKI system so that when > > errata is needed for a certian package, we could put the package name > > on the wiki, announce to the -legacy list, and the person that wants > > to do the backport could add their name next to the package on the > > wiki, and then process the backport. Whadda ya think? > > I think a Bugzilla report would be far more effective, similar to how > fedora.us currently requests packages. Why? Bugzilla posts are > permanent while the Wiki can be edited far too much. You need to check > too often if what you are reading in the Wiki is true or not. Further, IIRC, bugzilla posts can be monitored by those who have an interest in a given ticket. It's also a lot more organized than a Wiki. Truth be told, I don't see a lot of value in a Wiki. -Chuck -- Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology * Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=- * Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com * Support | chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
